| I'm
four week into my first cycle od steroids. I stack Equipoise (50 mg) and testosterone (200
mg). My question concerns the testosterone, which I purchased from a dealer in a local
gym. Following an injection, I suffer severe diarrhea and cramps; the former last about
three days. And the testosterone injection site hurts more than the Equipoise site. I've
enclosed the testosterone - is this the real thing ? Testosterone 200,
manufactured in Naucalpan, Mexico, by Tornel Laboratories, is a legitimate product. Tough
real, the product could be contaminated, thereby causing the local irritation at the
injection site, as well as the diarrhea and cramps. The sterility of Mexican veterinary
products is a big worry of mine, because some of the labs there are not monitored as
closely as labs are in the United States and thus they do not meet standards for purity.
Discontinuing use of this product immediately would be the best thing for you to do.
Here's another possible cause of your trouble: The dealer you purchased this product
from might have been altered its contents. There was a case in Texas in which a steroid
dealer was busted, and authorities discovered that he was filling previously used
multidose vials with nonsterile vegetable oil and reselling them. The prospect of
receiving used multidose vials is a scary one. I'm particularly concerned about the risk
of transmission of certain blood-borne maladies, including hepatitis and human
immunodefiency virus. Buying androgens on the black market is a potentially dangerous
undertaking. You just never know what's legit and what's not, or what might be disguised
by legitimate packaging.
You should also consider discontinuing your use of Equipoise (boldenone undecylenate).
This compound is used in veterinary medicine; many drugs like boldenone are not approved
for use by humans because of their toxicity. Their long-term use should be avoided. Though
I haven't heard of anybody experiencing problems from veterinary drugs, I strongly
recommend that you discontinue their use.
In the March 1993 issue, FLEX published a
white paper on androgens and their possible relationship to neurotransmitters; i.e., how
androgens may be related to psychological side effects (e.g., rage, anger, even psychotic
symptoms). is there any updated information on androgens and neurotransmitters, especially
relating to stacking drugs ?
What's more, I was wondering if an anxiolytic - say, something
in the benzodiazepine family, like Valium or Xanax - could mitigate the impact of steroids
on the brain and one's mental health. (I recall that Frank Zane used supplemental
tryptophan.) Also, would a serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitor, like Prozac, taken
during a steroid cycle help prevent some of the psychological effects of steroid use ?
Would it help with the depression that often accompanies the postcycle rebound phase ?
Androgens have myriad effects on human body, both physiological and psychological. It's
interesting to note that androgens have actually been used in some studies to treat
depression! The psychological effects of steroids vary from individual to individual, and
the scientific community doesn't agree on steroids' effects on rage and anger.
Most likely there is a dose/response relationship going on here. Based on the available
medical literature, most of the side effects you allude to occur in response to doses of
600 milligrams or more per week. To date, there is new research on stacking regimens and
their effects on neurotransmitters, and I don't expect to see any studies on that
relationship published in the future. It's extremely difficult to pass steroid studies
through human review boards at research institutions, and there's no way they would let
researchers give a stack to subjects. Can you imagine the number of muscleheads that would
volunteer ?
Benzodiazepines (e.g., Valium and Xanax) would certainly exert a calming effect on the
central nervous system of an androgen user. But taking these drugs to combat some of the
side effects of steroid use doesn't appear to be a smart move. Benzodiazepines can be
addictive, and long-term use would be ill-advised. A better choice for preventing
steroid-related psychological dysfunction would be Zoloft (sertraline ). Many physicians
report that it works well in androgen users and better than Prozac ( fluoxetine ).
By inference from the medical literature cited above, decreasing androgen dosages might
alleviate some of the problems you refer to. As to the efficacy of tryptophan, no medical
data supports its use in treating androgen-induced depression.
A word of caution : If you are experiencing poststeroid depression, don't ignore
your symptoms and don't attempt to treat yourself with serotonin-specific reuptake
inhibitors or benzodiazepines. Depression can turn into serious business if left
untreated, especially if you throw steroids into the mix.
I recently decided to try a cycle that I've
never done before. After reading the Anabolic Reference Guide and World Anabolic Review
(WAR), I decided on doing Parabolan (trenbolone) for gaining quality muscle mass. I do not
want to get big and bloated; I just want to be lean and muscular.
I'm not completely sure that what I purchased is real. I read
in WAR that "the chance of finding real Parabolan on the black market is around 5
%." This scares me. each individual ampule box is supposed to contain an ampule saw
and the one I purchased didn't. Could you examine the packaging and tell me if the stuff
is real ? If not, I don't want to go screwing with it!
The drug packaging along with the empty ampule you provided appear to be real. My
findings were also confirmed by an endocrinologist familiar with trenbolone.
I have no idea where World Anabolic Review obtained that figure of 5 % for real
Parabolan. I checked the book for a reference, but none was cited for that particular
statement. The authors of WAR appear to be engaging in speculation on this point. There
are only a few studies in peer-reviewed scientific literature on the availability of real
versus counterfeit steroids on the black market. Those studies used very small sample
sizes and tested only drugs available in certain areas of the United States. I don't think
the studies can be applied to the black market worldwide, and I certainly don't think the
authors of WAR took those studies into account when making their statement about fake
Parabolan.
The only way to be 100 % positive that you purchased real trenbolone is by performing a
gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) test in laboratory. GC/MS involves highly
sophisticated scientific procedures that are labor-intensive and costly. There are no
tests that you could perform at home, and no legitimate lab would conduct these assays for
you. It would not only be illegal but highly un-ethical for a scientist to participate in
such activities.
Ultimately, the only safe products are those you are absolutely certain are real,
notably those readily available in a given area and, therefore, difficult to counterfeit
because the real thing is so handy. Taking a chance and self-administering some unknown
substance could have serious health consequences - both short and long-term.
In reference to your statement about gaining quality muscle mass and avoiding a bloated
look, be aware that any androgen is going to cause water retention. Ergo, your reasoning
behind using trenbolone to avoid edema (water retention/bloating) is flawed. All androgens
alter the serum-electrolyte balance. Thus, the claims by the World Anabolic Review
and Anabolic Reference Guide that trenbolone does not cause water retention are
unsubstantiated.
Could it be that most athletes who use trenbolone may also restrict carbohydrate
intake, thus leading to the misconception that the drug does not cause bloating ?
Also, if atheletes are using several drugs at one time (stacking), how can anyone tell
if it's the trenbolone that's preventing the bloating ? these important questions should
be addressed before making a statement that one steroid does not cause certain side
effects that others do.
Edema is best avoided on low-dose regimens. As well, low-to-moderate doses (around
200-600 milligrams per week) followed by a period of no drug use will help to minimize
high blood pressure, which is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
I've just obtained a Mexican Rediject
Sostenon 250 by Organon. I've been told that Sostenon is excellent because it loads
quickly into system and stays available for quite a while. But I've also been told that
Sostenon may not be the best choice for me since this is my first time using steroids. I
hear that Sostenon is supposed to be used by those who've already done a few cycles.
What's the story ?
Sostenon 250 contains the following: testosterone propionate, testosterone
phenylpropionate, testosterone isocaproate and testosterone decanoate. The propionate is a
fast-acting ester of testosterone and enters the circulation almost immediately. The other
esters follow later, thus maintaining an even blood level of hormone. Because Sostenon
contains short- and long-acting esters of testosterone, each with a different absorption
rate, this preparation is able to achieve an even absorption of androgen into the general
circulation.
Sostenon is actually the most popular testosterone preparation prescribed by doctors in
Europe because of its prolonged action and balanced release. I don't know why Sostenon is
not produced for use in the United States. Many endocrinologists would much rather
prescribe Sostenon for their patents than any of the other testosterone products available
in the United States.
There are many forms of testosterone produced worldwide. keeping track of all of them
can be a bit confusing, so here is some information that might clear things up a bit. The
commercially available esters of testosterone all have different absorption rates from the
intramuscular depot (injection site). The absorption rate is determined by the length of
the side chain on by testosterone molecule. Some of the longer-acting testosterones are
enanthate, undecanoate, cypionate and cyclohexanecarboxylate. These longer-acting
testosterones can be active for about seven days.
The World Health Organization is experimenting with some testosterones that are active
for a month or more. These longer-acting forms are being studied for birth control, but
there appears to be no reason why these will not prove to benefit athletic enhancement as
well. To date, they have not been made available for public use. But keep reading Drug
World for breaking information on these extra-long-acting testosterone preparations.
As for your specific needs, you're right about the positive aspects of the preloaded
Rediject syringes, which are usually well-sealed and difficult to counterfeit. And let's
dispense the myth that you can use certain androgens only if you have "already done a
few cycles." Whoever told you that is not providing you with accurate info.
Make sure to consider both the positive and negative aspects of drugs use. Using drugs
without the proper information, and without a doctor's supervision, could pose serious
health risks. Realize also that cycling steroids means having to deal with the black
market and possibly facing the legal consequences if you get caught. Before you embark on
your travels to the drug world, think through your decision and make an educated choice.
There's a good chance that I can get some
Winstrol-V out of Mexico, but I'm told that there are so many counterfeits of the stuff
that I'd be taking a big risk. I've even heard that in one case, the Winstrol-V was
nothing more than very diluted Armor All. Is that possible ? How can I tell if the steroid
I'm getting is real ?
Winstrol-V is a brand name for the injectable version of stanozolol. It is manufactured
for veterinary use in the Unite States by Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, and was
originally synthesized at the Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute in 1959. About eight
years ago, Upjohn bought the rights to distribute the product, which explains why that
company's label appears on authentic version of Winstrol-V. Stanozolol is not produced in
Mexico by any drug manufacturer and, therefore, is not available under any trade name in
that country. Any product you purchase that claims to be Mexican Winstrol-V must be
counterfeit. If you use it, there is a 100 % chance you'll be injecting some unknown
substance into your body. Please do not purchase or self-administer any product claiming
to be Mexican stanozolol.
I have heard of some bodybuilders obtaining genuine Winstrol-V by way of Mexico:
They have a Mexican veterinarian special-order it form the United States or Canada. But
most Mexican vets don't have the resources to do this, and those who can do so at a very
high price. The most recent quote I can cite is $300 for a 30-milliliter multidose vial of
Winstrol-V. Besides paying astronomical prices for this drug, you would also have a
transport it across the border. If caught, you would pay some heavy fines and possibly
serve jail time.
Unfortunately, there are fake versions of stanozolol floating around on the black
market. With accessible technology like scanners and color laser printers, some
less-than-reputable steroid dealers are willing and able to generate fake versions of
stanozolol (usually aqueous testosterone or, worse, some compound resembling the
stanozolol, like Armor All). It would be very easy for someone to reproduce a label or
just transfer an authentic label from a used bottle of Winstrol-V.
How can you tell if someone has put a real label on a bogus bottle of steroids ? You
can't, even if you were using one of the steroid reference guides to gauge authenticity.
Going by the packaging or product labeling in hopes of distinguished real steroids from
fake ones is far from a sure thing.
There are two ways to test whether black-market drugs are real. One way is to have the
product analyzed via a complex laboratory procedure called gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry (GC/MS). The other way would be to self-administer the compound, then get a
drug test. If it shows up in your urine sample. you know you're getting the real thing.
Of course, neither method is practical. As noted n last month's column, it would be
illegal and unethical for a professional lab to run a GC/MS assay on black-market
steroids. And administering the substance to yourself is risky. Imagine if you injected
Armor All into your tail - it would not only be painful but could be deadly. If you're
concerned about the purity of the androgens you purchase, stay away from the black market
altogether.
Winstrol-V is one of those drugs with a wonderful reputation for increasing lean body
mass and decreasing bodyfat; hence people are willing to gamble on using counterfeits in
hopes of achieving a better physique. In reality, getting real stanozolol is a problem due
to heavy government restrictions on its distribution in the United States and abroad. If
you purchase and used the drug you described in your letter, you might seriously
compromise your health. Don't be fooled - again, there are no real versions of Mexican
stanozolol in existence.
A friend gave me some Glucotrol (glipizide)
tablets (10 milligrams) and triamcinolone acetonide cream (0,1%). He said that the
glipizide tablets would stimulate my pancreas into producing insulin and that the
triamcinolone cream could be used precontest to enhance fatty or weaker bodyparts (e.g.,
abs, hips, obliques). Will these drugs work ? What are the pros and cons of using these
products ?
Glipizide is classified as an antidiabetic drug, one with several mechanisms of action:
It stimulates insulin release from the beta cells of the pancreas, possibly by increasing
intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (a chemical messenger); it may improve the
ability of insulin to bind to its receptors; and it might also increase the number of
insulin receptors in a cell. All of these actions make glipizide a potent medication for
treating Type II (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes.
In a normal nondiabetic individual, glipizide would certainly increase insulin
production. But would that increased production be enough to mediate an anabolic response
and, therefore, an increase in muscle mass ? I think not. Just because you temporarily
increase the production of a hormone does not mean that it will translate into an increase
in lean body mass. For instance, instead of taking glipizide, you could just take a
quantity of sugar between meals to increase insulin production.
In my opinion using glipizide to increase muscle mass is foolhardly and a waste of
time. Like all drugs, glipizide has its own set of side effects and multidrug
interactions. Be aware that using glipizide in conjunction with androgens could create an
enhanced hypoglycemic response, calling for careful monitoring of blood-glucose levels.
The hype surrounding insulin and its ability to increase muscle hypertrophy in
weight-trained humans is not yet backed by any scientific studies. Many in the athletic
community have provided anecdotal reports that insulin s helping them to make huge gains
in muscle mass; but again, these claims are not supported by peer-reviewed scientific
literature.
Let's look at insulin self-administration with a critical eye. How can an athlete
identify insulin as being solely responsible for muscle growth during a given cycle ? How
is this being measured ? Is insulin alone creating the gains, or is it insulin taken in
conjunction with other ergogenic substances (e.g., somatotropin, thyroid hormones,
androgens, beta2 agonists) ? Furthermore, those with a medical condition called
hyperinsulinemia (an abnormally high level of insulin in the blood) do not have greater
muscle mass than those without the condition. So, one could reason that high insulin
levels are not a prerequisite for having big muscles.
Those issues listed above should be thoroughly researched and thought out before
jumping into insulin use - or glipizide use, for that matters. As well, you need to
evaluate the health risks associated with high insulin levels and use of this hormone is
general, There is no question that misusing insulin can kill you - that's not even up for
debate. By self-administering insulin, you stimulate cells in your body to increase their
uptake of glucose and amino acids an anabolic response that causes blood-glucose levels to
drop. If these levels drop too low, you could go into a hypoglycemic coma and possibly
die.
There's also a theory currently being debated in the medical community that exogenous
insulin administration causes many diabetics to suffer a whole list of maladies (e.g.,
atherosclerosis, kidney disease, retinal neuropathy). These conditions are very serious
and, in some cases, life-threatening. A study recently published in the New England
Journal of Medicine (J.P.Despres, et al., "Hyperinsulinemia as independent risk
factor for ischemic heart disease," 334:952-7, 1996) reveals that high insulin levels
during fasting appear to be an independent predictor of heart disease in men - not a good
portent.
Insulin is a potent growth factor. While growth is cool for skeletal muscles, the
presence of a high level of a powerful growth factor for an extended period can negatively
affect other parts of your body. Receptor desensitization is another concern if you are
receiving high levels of insulin for a long duration.
The risk-to-reward ratio for using glipizide and/or insulin as a training aid does not
look favorable at this point. Why screw around with insulin levels when something else be
much safer and more effective ? Better yet, focus on your training and nutrition
exclusively and leave the drugs alone.
Your use of triamcinolone acetonide is also a concern. Triamcinolone is a
corticosteroid and has no anabolic effect or lipolytic (fat-burning) properties
whatsoever. In fact, corticosteroids are catabolic! Rubbing this cream on your body will
not have any effect on the problem areas you mentioned in your letter but would reduce
inflammation if you're having skin problems. Whoever us providing you with these drugs and
the information on how to use them is misleading you. Neither of these products will
promote muscle growth.
I remember when "cutting edge" meant stacking a couple of steroids during a
cycle. Now, growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin, clenbuterol and other
drugs are the rage. We're in a whole new era of drug use in sports. Consequently, science
and medicine have not been able to thoroughly study these drugs and their effects on
athletes. the latter are entering uncharted territory, and some might pay dearly for their
exploration. At this rate, the days of stacking just a few different steroids are
beginning to seem innocent. |